Tag Archive for: investment planning

Avoid This Investing Mistake at All Costs When Transitioning to Retirement

“Why would anyone just sit there through a downturn in market prices and ‘lose’ money?  Wouldn’t it make sense to just sell everything, wait for the dust to settle, and then buy back in after?”

Although nobody with this thought likes it to be labeled as such, this is classic Market Timing: the strategy of attempting to sell in and out of markets on a timely basis in order to avoid short-term losses and capture all upside gains.  This stems from the commonly held belief, which is perpetuated by the financial media, that investment success is achieved by the few who are “in the know” who are able to successfully “navigate” in and out of markets at just the right time.

It’s sounds 100% logical in theory.  Unfortunately, however, it doesn’t work in practice.

History is littered with proof that this belief is false.  Noted Dartmouth Professor Kenneth French’s extensive research concluded that you would have had to be precisely correct on the sell and buy points 74% of the time in order to equal returns earned by continuously holding shares through all market cycles.

And, that a survey of famous market timers revealed that only a handful were correct more than 50% of the time, and the best was still at only 66%!

October 2007 to March 2009

History and distance from traumatic times have a way of providing clarity for future action.  However, at first glance, that’s not always true with investing.

Now that more than a decade has passed, the massive market downturn we experienced over 18 months during “The Great Recession” from October, 2007 to March, 2009 appears to be a period that anyone and everyone should have been able to navigate in and out of successfully.

What we all forget with time, though, is that we didn’t experience that 18-month period of time in one instance.  We experienced it one day, and in some instances, one hour at a time.

From October 10, 2007 to March 9, 2009, broad stock market prices fell almost 57% from peak to trough.

However, it was not a straight line down that was obvious to interpret and act on.

Experiencing Markets on a Daily Basis

Similar to what we’ve experienced over the last two months, during that 18-month timeframe, if you recorded market results on a daily basis, here’s what you would have experienced:

  • Market prices closed up 46% of the days, and
  • Market prices closed down 54% of the days

Isn’t that incredible!  During the 18-month period of time when market prices fell over 50%, market prices closed up about 173 days (46%) and down about 202 days (54%).

I’m sure you expected it to be much worse than that with a much larger percentage of down days.  (For reference, from 1973 through 2015, market prices were up 53% of days, and down 47% of days.) 

So, as we experience markets on a day-to-day basis, that 18-month period wasn’t that different than the average.

What this demonstrates is that, when dealing with markets, our experience is never a straight line up or down.

Instead, it’s more like: up one day, down the next, down the next, up the next, up, up, down, down, down, up, down, up……

That’s how we experience markets, and that’s what makes market timing impossible as a long-term strategy.

Why Market Timing is So Hard

You not only have to make the correct call to sell out, and then to buy in on the correct days, but you have to make those calls at precisely the correct time during each day because prices change all day long.  (And, because all asset classes behave and perform differently, you have to make those split-second decisions on each asset class you own.)

Just think of markets during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic where prices moved as much as 12% in one day!

Although it feels as if there was throughout time, there is never a clear and unquestioned signal in the moment when a decision must be made to sell or buy.  Never!

That’s why buying into the belief that you can successfully time when to get out and when to get back in is so destructive to your financial independence.

Put It in a Drawer

After you have set aside five years’ worth of your anticipated withdrawals outside of the short-term volatility of stocks, i.e. in money markets and short-term fixed income holdings, and directed all dividends you earn to flow into your money market fund to support your lifestyle cashflow needs, the long-term solution with the rest of your Retirement Bucket™ is to remain globally diversified and strategically weighted across multiple asset classes during all market cycles with a goal of capturing the long-term higher expected returns each asset class offers.

And, then “put it in a drawer” and go about living your life.

Go ahead and pull it out of the drawer during pre-determined periods of time, i.e. once a quarter, half year, or yearly, and rebalance your holdings back to your originally prescribed mix.

However, as we have just highlighted, do not delude yourself into thinking that looking at it on a daily, weekly, monthly, or even quarterly basis will make you more knowledgeable, provide you with any signals to act on, or produce better results.

What this allows you to do is remain confidently invested for the rest of your life knowing you will not be forced to sell your long-term stock index funds during a temporary market correction in order to provide needed cashflow to support your desired and well-earned lifestyle.

Download the PDF

Annuities: When to Consider and When to Run for the Hills

As promised in the last edition after the questions I received, I’m now going to give you some examples of situations where I believe you should run away from annuities when they are being proposed to you, and some situations where an annuity might be something for you to consider.

Before addressing situations where I believe annuities are grossly oversold, here are the three situations where annuities might be appropriate for you as long as you do your proper research before signing on the dotted line.

1. Tax Deferral

If you have funds held outside of your IRA, Roth IRA, and/or employer sponsored retirement plans that currently earn interest, dividends, and/or capital gains that you’re not currently spending, an annuity can be used to defer income taxes until you need the money to spend. 

There are three potential benefits of doing this:

  1. Deferring the Tax: You control “when” you pay the tax.  By doing so, you can benefit from compound interest and gains on the balances that would have gone to taxes if held outside of the annuity.
  2. Taxes on Social Security Income: The amount of tax you pay on your social security income is in direct relation to the amount of income you receive in addition to social security.  The lower the amount of your other “provisional” income, the less of your social security income that is subject to tax.

If you currently have interest, dividends, and/or capital gains coming from investments which you’re not spending, using an annuity to defer the taxes on those items not only reduces your taxes on that interest, but it may also reduce the amount of tax you must pay on your social security income.

  • Medicare Part B Premiums: As many of our Relaxing Retirement members have learned, your Medicare Part B premiums you pay are based on the amount of income on your 1040 tax return the prior year. 

Like the example above, if you reduce your taxable income, you may qualify to pay a lower Medicare Part B premium.  One tool to reduce your taxable interest, dividend, and capital gain income is a tax deferred annuity.

There is a downside to this tax deferral strategy, however, which you must know going in.  

All money withdrawn from a tax deferred annuity over your initial investment are considered “ordinary income” and thus taxed at ordinary income tax rates

For example, if you deposit $100,000 into a tax deferred variable annuity and it grows to $150,000, you will pay ordinary income tax rates on the $50,000 of growth when you withdraw the funds.

If you invested in a traditional mutual or exchange traded fund held outside of an annuity or IRA and the value increased from $100,000 to $150,000, you would pay “capital gains tax rates” upon the sale.

This is significant because federal ordinary income tax rates can be as high as 37.0% currently, whereas capital gains tax rates top out at 20%.  

If the investments you will own inside the tax deferred annuity will qualify for capital gains tax treatment, you have to strongly weigh the long-term tax deferral benefits vs. the higher tax rate you and your family will pay upon withdrawal.

2. Tax Free Exchange From Life Insurance

If you currently own whole life insurance (that you’ve determined no longer need) with significant cash value, you may have a tax problem when/if you cash in your policy. 

To the extent that your cash value is greater than the premiums you’ve paid over the years, you will owe ordinary income taxes.

In other words, if you have a policy with a cash value of $100,000 and over the years, you’ve paid a total of $60,000 in premiums, when you surrender your policy, you will owe ordinary income taxes on the difference, i.e. $40,000.

A way of deferring this tax burden is to directly exchange your life insurance policy’s cash value into a tax deferred annuity.

By doing this, there is no tax burden at the time of the exchange and you get to continue tax deferred growth on your funds until you choose to withdraw funds.

3. Annuitizing

Annuitizing simply means turning your savings into monthly income for a stated period of time, typically for life.

  • Covering a Specific Expense:  While this would never be the situation a Relaxing Retirement member would find themselves in, if social security is your only source of guaranteed monthly income, and you have a specific bill that must be paid each and every month, consider funding an immediate annuity.  Structure the amount of the payment to you to cover that expense for the period of time the expense exists, i.e. a mortgage.
  • Medicaid Planning:  It would be impossible to cover all the issues concerning qualifying for Medicaid in this edition.  However, as we reviewed recently, in the big picture, if you have assets above a very minimal level, you will not qualify for Medicaid assistance to pay for your care. 

    One strategy used by many elder law practitioners is to move current assets into an immediate Medicaid approved annuity. 

    In the eyes of the federal government, once the funds are deposited to the immediate annuity, the asset no longer exists.  Only the income from that asset which significantly increases your chances of qualifying for Medicaid assistance.

    However, the same warning that I’ve raised still applies here.  Remember that when you annuitize, you give up access to your money other than receiving your monthly income.  When you and/or your beneficiary pass away, the insurance company keeps the money.
  • Guaranteed Income:  If you want some portion of your monthly income guaranteed, an immediate annuity can accomplish this. 

    Two caveats come with this, however.  The first I just alluded to which is to remember that once you annuitize, your asset is turned over to the insurance company.

    The second is inflation.  With most annuities, the payment is guaranteed for a certain period of time, typically for life.  However, there is no cost of living increase each year to keep pace with inflation.  So, if your monthly payment is $2,000 per month, 10 and 20 years down the road, you’re still going to receive $2,000 per month even if inflation has decreased the value of that $2,000.

Now let’s take a look at situations where I believe annuities are being oversold.

1. Buying a Variable Annuity “Inside” of Your IRA or Roth IRA

As was the case with the story of the brother of an existing Relaxing Retirement member I shared with you recently, a classic example of a situation I see way too often that I don’t recommend is investing in a variable annuity inside your IRA or Roth IRA.

As I outlined above, one of the benefits of an annuity is tax deferred growth of your money.  However, all investments held inside of an IRA or Roth IRA grow tax deferred already.

Given this, why would you need to place a tax deferred vehicle (annuity) inside of a tax deferred vehicle (your IRA)?  An example of this is rolling over balances from your retirement plan at work, i.e. your 401(k), 403(b), or your pension plan into an IRA and investing in an annuity inside your IRA.

Although sellers of annuities tout all the bells and whistles of complicated annuities, there really is no valid reason to invest in one inside of an IRA.

Unfortunately, one of the main reasons why it’s recommended so often is the commission paid on an annuity vs. an alternative.  With the exception of a few no-load annuities (offered through fiduciary advisors who accept no sales commissions), fixed, variable, and equity indexed annuities typically pay much higher commissions, so there’s a significant incentive for a broker to sell an annuity instead of just a mutual fund or an exchange traded fund.

All things being equal, this alone would not be a profound problem.  However, in order to pay those higher commissions, the insurance company sponsoring the variable annuity must charge you higher fees!

For this reason, I do not recommend this practice.

2. Equity Indexed Annuities

During volatile financial markets, products are created and heavily marketed which appear to be “one-size-fits-all” solutions. 

In my opinion, equity indexed annuities fall into this category.  Their promise is to allow you to invest in stocks (using one or more indexes, like the S&P 500), yet not lose any money personally if the market index goes down.

When you first hear the concept, it sounds extremely attractive.  In short, they propose that you will receive the upside benefits of investing in stocks without the downside risk! 

However, as with most financial instruments, you have to read the fine print.  If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Insurance companies do place a floor on your deposit so that when you withdraw funds from the equity indexed annuity, you will receive no less than you deposited.

However, a few key points to note:

  • If you withdraw funds over the first 10 to 25 years, you have to pay a stiff surrender charge for access to your money.  And, I’ve seen that charge be as high as 15%. 
  • Your upside potential is limited.  If the S&P 500, or whatever index your annuity is tied to, earns 10%, you don’t get credited with a 10% gain on your equity indexed annuity. Your gains are capped at a much lower percentage and the insurance company keeps the rest.
  • There is a high price to pay for this “guarantee.”  If you break open these complicated products, you will discover that you are paying significant fees to the insurance company to provide their guarantee, and to pay commissions to the broker who sells the equity indexed annuity.

Without knowing any more, if you objectively stand back and examine this product, you have to ask yourself how the insurance company can take on this exposure and not have a problem down the road. 

During the Covid-19 pandemic, for example, when the S&P 500 Index dropped over 34%, how did their company stand up when they had to guarantee no losses to their equity indexed annuity customers? 

How are they going to keep that promise indefinitely if the stock market doesn’t cooperate and there is a run on annuity deposits from their customers?

For this reason alone, I’m not a fan of equity indexed annuities.

To sum up, I do believe there are very limited situations which warrant using an annuity as long as you do so with your eyes wide open.  I simply believe that those situations are much, much more narrow than those currently being sold today.   

Homework Assignment

Once you’ve digested these last few editions of RETIREMENT GAME PLAN dissecting annuities, and your interest is peaked, here are just a few more recommendations for you before considering using an annuity:

  • Access to Your Money: Be very clear on the language of the insurance company’s surrender charges when you need access to your money.  This is critical.  There are companies who have no surrender charges when accessing your money.
  • Insurance Company Ratings:  With fixed annuities specifically, be careful to examine the independent ratings of any insurance company you’re considering.  Remember, how well you do is directly tied to the performance of that insurance company. 
  • Fees:  Specific to variable annuities, be very clear what their insurance charges are to run the annuity, typically 1.50% or so as a base, and much more in many cases for the “bells and whistles” agents and brokers love to add on.  If a variable annuity is what you’re after, a few companies now have very low cost variable annuities.  Additionally, examine the internal management fees of the mutual fund subaccount options.  Insurance companies tend to offer very expensive, actively managed funds as opposed to low-cost index funds.  These excess fees can have a significant negative impact on your returns. 

I hope this has been helpful for you.  I strongly recommend keeping these editions of RETIREMENT GAME PLAN close by for reference whenever you see an “attractive” ad for annuities, or you receive a “pitch” from a broker. 

Download the PDF

Investment Strategy Problem #1 in Retirement – Wrong Goal

In the last edition of RETIREMENT GAMEPLAN, I shared the story of Ron and Rita and the good and bad news I had to share with them.

After analyzing and crafting their custom-designed Retirement Blueprint™, taking into account all of their priorities and all their resources, the good news we shared was they had enough money to make it all work!

Enough money and income from social security and a small pension to continue living exactly the way they wanted without running out of money over their expected lifetime.

What an accomplishment!

But, before the party balloons were released, I had to share some sour news with them as well.

And, that sour news as that if they continued to invest the same way they had, their Retirement Bucket of investments would run out in 8 to 9 years.

Now, that may seem like a contradiction, but it’s not. 

They do have enough built up to make it work, but their Retirement Resource Forecasters that we use to design their Retirement Blueprint™ have some assumptions built into them, as all forecasts do.

One of those assumptions was that the rate of return earned on their Retirement Bucket™ of investments had to average 1.5% above the rate of inflation over the duration of their life expectancy. 

Historically, this has been accomplished without significant effort.  Long-term inflation and market performance statistics spell that out clearly.

However, given Ron and Rita’s actions (as illustrated by their investment spreadsheets that they shared with me), it’s extremely unlikely that they’ll be able to accomplish this.

The reason I had to reveal this piece of bad news with Ron and Rita was the 2020 DALBAR Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior research that I shared with you in the last edition. 

To refresh your memory, here’s what their study on the results for the 30-year period from January, 1990 through December, 2019 revealed:

  • The Average annual return of the S&P 500 Stock Market Index from was 9.96% (including dividends reinvested)
  • Over the same 30 year period, the average annual return of the “average” equity mutual fund investor (not investment, but an investor, i.e. a person) was 5.04%

What these numbers tell us is that, while the S&P 500 Market Index delivered a strong average annual return over those 30 years of 9.96%, the average stock mutual fund investor (a person, not an investment) only achieved 5.04%!

That means that the average stock mutual fund investor’s return was only half of what the broad stock market index provided each and every year!

How incredible is that!

What Can We Learn From This?

What you can’t help but take away from those statistics is that, while it makes all the news, markets (or bad investments) are not our biggest problem. 

The BIG problem is what the average investor does with markets, i.e. investor behavior, which is driven by their “strategy” or lack thereof.

Forget for a moment about trying to “beat the market” which is what everybody loves to talk about and talk shows are built on.

The average stock mutual fund investor earned 49.4% less each and every year than the broad market S&P 500 index. 

Think about that for a moment.  Something that we all can control is what our biggest problem is.

I recognize that I’m repeating myself, but I’m doing so to emphasize this critical point.

It’s uncomfortable, but it’s the only logical and rational conclusion we can reach given the results of this research report.  What else could possibly explain the massive difference in real life returns that people receive?

What Can You Do To Close This Performance Gap?

The first piece of news to share is that there is no one reason or one strategy you can use to close this gap. 

However, over the last 32 years, there are several “strategic behavioral mistakes” that I’ve personally witnessed that I’d like to share with you.

And, these are the biggest reasons why I believe the average investor earned 49.4% less than the broad stock market provided over the last 30 years. 

Let’s start today with Reason #1 why I believe this massive performance gap exists:

The Wrong “INVESTMENT GOVERNING” Issue

Let me clarify what I mean by “Investment Governing Issue” because it has many important points that I suggest you make a note of.

First, a statistic for you that you may have heard me share with you before: the average retirement age today in America is age 62. 

If you are a 62 year old couple (and each of you does not smoke), insurance company mortality tables tell us that at least one of you will live to be 92 years of age!

Please take a moment to go back and read that last paragraph before going on.

That means that, if you’re age 62, you’ve got 30 years with which to provide lifestyle sustaining income. 

30 years! 

Not five. 

Not ten. 

Not even just twenty. 

But 30 years!

The Goal: Lifestyle Sustaining Income

By “lifestyle sustaining” income, I mean income that keeps your standard of living the same even when prices rise.

Let me put that into perspective for you. 

  • In 1932, a first class stamp cost 3 cents.
  • In 1971, it was 8 cents.
  • In 1991, it was 29 cents.
  • In 2021, it’s 58 cents! 

This is not to send a “better” letter in the mail, but the same letter.

While there are very few guarantees in life, one that I believe we can prudently count on is the fact that life will continue to get more and more and more expensive.

As I just illustrated, the price to mail the exact same letter costs you twice what it did just 30 years ago.

That’s extremely instructive given the 30-year average lifespan of a 62 year old retiring couple.

Protecting Principal vs. Protecting Purchasing Power

Now, here’s the problem from an investment standpoint…what is the dominant governing issue among the overwhelming majority of investors as they approach their retirement transition?

Protecting Principal! 

Whenever you hear the overwhelming majority of dedicated savers approaching their retirement transition talk about “risk”, this is what they’re focused on.  Above all else, “we have to protect our principal.”

And, this governs their investment decisions.

In reality, the biggest financial issue, as I’ve just illustrated, is the protection of your “purchasing power,” or your ability to sustain the same lifestyle you desire.

This has nothing to do with wanting “more” for yourself. 

It’s about sustaining the same lifestyle. 

Even if inflation is only 3% over the next 30 years, and I would strenuously caution you against using that low of a number, but even if it is only 3%, you’ll need $244 to pay for the same goods and services that $100 in your pocket pays for right now.

That means that if groceries currently cost you $100 per week, they’ll cost $244 for the exact same groceries.

Again, this is not a bonus to protect your purchasing power.  It’s a bare necessity

Yet, the overwhelming majority of dedicated savers approaching their retirement transition have as their #1 goal to “protect their principal,” when in fact it has to be the protection of their lifestyle sustaining income.

I can’t stress enough how important it is to clearly distinguish between those two goals if you want your hard earned money to be there for you for the rest of your life.

Stay tuned for the next edition as I’ll reveal the 2nd biggest reason for the horrific performance gap of the average investor, and what you can do about it.

Download the PDF